The Validity of the Confucian Three-Year Mourning Ritual System and Its Contemporary Adaptation

I. Introduction

The Confucian mourning ritual was introduced during the late Goryeo period and became widespread in the late Joseon period. This occurred as a result of Joseon’s policy as a Confucian ritual-based state, which systematically reorganized both state and household rituals according to Confucian philosophy. Consequently, the four Confucian-style ceremonial occasions of coming of age, wedding, funeral, and ancestral rites (gwan, hon, sang, je 冠婚喪祭) established the foundational framework for Korean ceremonial practices, continuing even into contemporary society. Thus, the cultural tradition of funeral rites in Korea became firmly rooted in Confucian practices (S. Kim 2012b, 12–13).

However, contemporary Korean funeral practices exhibit considerable diversity, including Western-style, modernized, and religious forms, significantly differing from traditional Confucian rituals. Three major factors underlie this transformation. First, industrialization and urbanization—consequences of modernization—and changes in family structure have reshaped funeral culture. Second, multicultural influences have introduced funeral rituals from various religions, reflecting the inseparable relationship between death and religion (Cheon 2000, 136) and people’s tendency to approach death according to their own religious beliefs. Third, the process of Westernization, initiated during the Japanese colonial period, also had significant effects. Under Japan’s Westernizing policies, the colonial Korean society was influenced notably by the symbolism of black as representative of death (S. Kim 2024a).

The three-year mourning ritual (samnyeonsang 三年喪) is a fundamental ritual and ideological cornerstone of Confucian funeral rites (S. Kim 2025b). This procedure involves transforming the soul of the deceased into an ancestral spirit after the disposal of the body. For the bereaved family, it functions as a buffer mechanism to overcome the emotional shock and existential crisis resulting from the death of a family member. The origin of the three-year mourning ritual is documented in Book of Rites (Liji 記): “Confucius said, ‘Only after three years does a child leave the embrace of their parents. Therefore, a three-year mourning period for ones parents is universally recognized throughout the world.’”¹ This practice is rooted in filial piety (xiao 孝), or the foundational Confucian principle for establishing familial and social order.

As indicated by the term “samiljang” (“three-day funeral”), most contemporary funerals in Korea are held over three days. The origin of this practice lies in the series of ritual regulations imposed during the Japanese colonial period under the guise of modernization, beginning with the “Ritual Ordinance” (Uirye Junchik 儀禮準則, 1934) and later formalized through the “Family Ritual Standards” (Gajeong Uirye Junchik 家庭儀禮準則) of 1969. As a result, modern Korean funerals have largely lost the symbolic significance traditionally associated with rituals of mourning, retaining only a formal procedure for disposal of the body. Consequently, contemporary funeral practices have faced criticism, with some pointing out that the modern method of corpse disposal differs little from waste management practices (Faure 1997, 10).

According to the dictionary definition, “funeral” (jangnye 葬禮) refers specifically to “the ceremonial procedure of handling a corpse in funeral rites; it is a term used in modern society to replace traditional mourning rituals” (S. Kim 2022). As indicated by the term jangnye, contemporary Korean death rites are predominantly confined to the handling of the deceased’s body. This implies the disappearance of the traditional Confucian ritual process of transforming the deceased’s spirit into an ancestral deity, a practice that previously constituted the core of Confucian mourning procedures. Additionally, this signifies the loss of the ritualized process that helps the bereaved family members overcome the trauma caused by the death of their loved one. In an era when cremation rates reach 93%, the concept of funeral rites is essentially recognized as the process of cremating and subsequently enshrining the deceased’s remains.

Nevertheless, the Confucian three-year mourning ritual still persists in contemporary Korean society. Admittedly, it tends to be maintained primarily among historically significant head families (jongga 宗家) that possess ancestral shrines. Even today, the tradition of Confucian three-year mourning rituals continues. For instance, a three-year mourning ritual for the lineal descendant of Yi Hwang 李滉 (1501-1570) has been observed since March 8, 2024, and a similar ritual for the senior daughter-in-law (jongbu 宗婦) of the head family of Kim Seong-il 金誠一 (1538-1593) began on March 20, 2024, and is still ongoing. While statistically the Confucian three-year mourning ritual may appear insignificant in contemporary society, it still holds considerable cultural significance.

In order to examine traditional Confucian mourning rituals, I have continuously investigated cases of Confucian-style mourning rituals that persist in contemporary Korean society. Among these cases, I have conducted participant observation research on the three-year mourning rituals for Yi U-seop (1931-2007)² in 2007 and for Kim Si-in (1917-2008) in 2008, subsequently publishing these findings in ethnographic reports.³

Additionally, I have further participated directly in researching several other three-year mourning rituals, including those for Yi Dong-eun 李東恩 (1909-2009, the head descendant of the Joseon-era scholar Yi Hwang), Yi Jong-min (1900-1993), Jo Pil-nam 趙必男 (1917-1993, wife of the head descendant of the Joseon-era scholar Kim Seong-il), and Bak Hyo-su 朴孝秀 (1900-1997).

The mourning rituals selected as research cases, such as Kim Si-in's mourning and Yi Dong-eun's mourning, are associated with the head families (jongson 宗孫) of prominent Confucian scholars like Kim Seong-il and Yi Hwang, whose Confucian traditions are particularly pronounced. The other cases similarly represent households either from head family lineages or those maintaining ancestral tablets (sinju 神主) in shrines and practicing a Confucian way of life. Exceptionally, Yi U-seop's mourning is distinct in that Yi U-seop himself, who did not pursue modern education, consistently adhered to Confucian principles throughout his lifetime. Thus, all of these cases share a common characteristic: they represent families whose way of life is firmly rooted in Confucian traditions.

This paper has two primary objectives: first, to examine the continuing validity of the Confucian three-year mourning ritual in contemporary society, and second, to analyze how the Confucian three-year mourning ritual adapts and transforms in response to the contemporary sociocultural context. The analytical materials employed are derived from Confucian three-year mourning rituals in which I have participated fully or partially through observational research.

II. Modern Funeral Culture Generalized as the Three-Day Funeral

Cultural change inevitably accompanies cultural accumulation. This aligns with the idea that tradition continues precisely because culture changes. As Ravaisson-Mollien ([1838] 2001) argues, habits, once acquired, exist through continuous change and perpetual movement; hence, the inability to accept change implies the inability to sustain habits. In other words, a culture that fails to accommodate continual change cannot persist.

In contemporary Korea, funerals have become primarily focused on corpse management. The funeral procedures outlined on websites of funeral halls and funeral service companies—all central players in the funeral industry—typically involve handling the deceased’s body over a period of three days. While Confucian terminology still appears in these modern procedures, the meanings attached to them have deviated considerably from traditional Confucian funeral rituals. Some procedures are distorted in their symbolic meanings, and occasionally new rituals are artificially introduced, leading to the erosion of the symbolic significance inherent in traditional rites.

For example, the ritual of yeomseup 斂襲 performed on the second day currently integrates various distinct procedures into one single step: bathing and cleansing the corpse, dressing it in funeral clothes (seup 襲), wrapping and tying the body (soryeom 小斂), and placing the body in the coffin (daeryeom 大斂). However, distortion occurs when ipgwan 入棺, the primary action of placing the body into the coffin, is separated and emphasized as a distinct major step unrelated to daeryeom.

The Seongbokje 成服祭 can be understood as a rite held after family members change into mourning attire (seongbok 成服). Yet in current practices, after changing into mourning clothes, mourners perform reciprocal condolences, followed by rituals such as offering morning sacrifices (sangsik 上食 and jojeon 朝奠). But the specific procedure known traditionally as Seongbokje itself is omitted. Likewise, the ritual termed Barinje 發靷祭, now understood as a pre-funeral rite preceding the departure of the coffin, corresponds more closely to the traditional gyeonjeon 遣奠, as the concept of Barinje does not originally exist in Confucian funeral rites.

Additional practices such as the wearing of black ribbons or non-traditional black modernized hanbok worn by women—without clear cultural origins or standardized definitions—also represent aspects of funeral culture lacking historical precedent or official prescription. These developments disregard what Victor Turner (1966) defined as the “ritual process,” including the underlying structures and functions inherent in traditional rituals. Behind these transformations lies a phenomenon of funeral capitalism that deliberately overlooks the psychology of mourners and the symbolic meanings of funeral rites, driven primarily by commercial profit motives (Han 2024, 40-46).

Changes in contemporary Korean funeral culture began during the Japanese colonial period. The first factor was the simplification of rituals as part of Japan’s cultural assimilation policy under the guise of modernization. A concrete manifestation of this policy was the “Ritual Ordinance” (Uirye Junchik 儀禮準則) promulgated by the Japanese colonial government in 1934. Later, simplification was intensified through the “Improved Funeral Standards” enforced in 1941 as Japan prepared for World War II (GCJY 1941, 66-69), resulting in traditional funeral rites becoming targets of rejection. This policy of simplification continued after liberation through various state directives, starting with the “Family Ritual Standards” of 1969, amended in 1999, and currently known as the “Healthy Family Ritual Standards.” As indicated by the term “healthy,” the state intervened legally, compelling simplification and thus restricting individuals’ family rituals.

The state-driven simplification of funeral rites has consequently produced a situation where symbolic meanings traditionally associated with funeral rites were ignored, reducing funerals primarily to formal procedures for handling corpses. The funeral industry, driven by commercial profit, tacitly supported this approach, resulting in today’s three-day funeral (samiljang) becoming standard in contemporary Korea.

The terminology referring to death rites has likewise shifted from sangnye 喪禮 (“mourning rituals”) to jangnye 葬禮 (“funeral rituals”). Although the term jangnye was historically used, it originally referred specifically to respectfully managing a corpse (jangsa 葬事) (S. Kim 2010, 438–440). Notably, the official “Ritual Ordinance” and the “(Healthy) Family Ritual Standards” continue to use the term sangnye, defining it as “the ceremony conducted from death until the completion of burial or cremation” (S. Kim 2010, 439–40). However, in reality, the state has erased traditional functions and meanings of mourning rites, including spiritual transformation of the deceased into an ancestor and the therapeutic processes for the bereaved family’s trauma.

The second factor of change involves methods of body disposal.⁴ As reflected in Korea’s cremation rate of 93%, cremation has become the prevalent form of body disposal. This rise results from government policies emphasizing efficient land use, advocacy campaigns by civic groups, and convenience-oriented values. The government and civic organizations initiated extensive cremation campaigns, utilizing slogans such as “Prevent Korea’s beautiful landscape from becoming filled with cemeteries.”⁵

Additionally, burial sites traditionally require considerable human resources and expenses for maintenance. Cremation, by contrast, became preferred due to its relative ease and lower management costs, thus raising cremation rates through convenience-driven factors.

The third aspect involves a spatial shift from private family grave sites and clan cemeteries to collective or park cemeteries. Traditionally, ancestral graves were not considered undesirable but rather sacred and familiar spaces. Folklore stories describe travelers sleeping near graves at night, indicating a perception of grave sites as comfortable, familiar places. However, during Japanese colonial rule, authorities compelled the creation of communal cemeteries located away from villages, turning cemeteries into spaces associated with fear and avoidance. This historical change laid the foundation for contemporary NIMBY (“Not In My Back Yard”) attitudes towards funeral facilities (Heo 2009; Kim and Hong 2010; W. Kim 2012; Kim and Jeong 2012; Ham and Hyun 2013). With the rise of cremation, burial grounds are now increasingly shifting toward columbarium facilities for enshrining cremated remains.

The fourth element is the delegation of family rituals to professional specialists (S. Kim 2010, 74–79). Put differently, funeral capitalism has appropriated family rituals. Funeral capitalism refers to a crude form of capitalism driven solely by profit maximization, systematically excluding humanistic values such as ethical conduct and responsibility (Han 2024, 302). Due to industrialization and urbanization, family rituals are no longer conducted at homes but rather at neutral, third-party facilities. The funeral industry, comprising specialized professionals, now leads these rituals (S. Kim 2012a, 192–95), resulting in funeral ceremonies driven primarily by commercial interests rather than the original intentions of the bereaved family.

Due to these multifaceted changes, contemporary Korean funerals have become standardized as three-day events. This phenomenon is a direct product of cultural shifts, the “(Healthy) Family Ritual Standards,” and funeral capitalism. Consequently, the traditional Confucian functions of funeral rituals—transforming the deceased’s soul into an ancestral spirit and assisting mourners to overcome the existential crisis triggered by loss—have largely disappeared. Modern Korean funerals, standardized as three-day events, have thus been reduced primarily to the function of corpse disposal.

III. Confucian Three-Year Mourning Ritual as a Cultural Tradition

The practice of the Confucian three-year mourning ritual can be traced back as early as ancient Korean societies.⁶ Although the funeral rites of King Gwanggaeto 廣開土 (r. 391-412) and King Muryeong 武寧 (r. 501-523), which also lasted three years, were not explicitly Confucian rituals, they shared the commonality of a three-year duration. Officially, the Confucian three-year mourning ritual was introduced during the Goryeo dynasty, but initially lacked a practical basis for widespread implementation (An 2014, 105). Furthermore, considering the fact that Goryeo granted only 100 days of leave for the mourning of close family members, it is doubtful that the full three-year mourning ritual was performed in practice during this period (Lee 2013, 90).

In the late Goryeo period, Neo-Confucianism introduced a philosophical shift from original Confucian ritual systems toward those based on Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals (Zhuzi Jiali 朱子家禮). With the adoption of Zhu Xi’s 朱熹 (1140-1200) ritual system during this era, funeral rituals transitioned from Buddhist traditions to Confucian ones (Chang 1990, 9-10).

Under the Joseon dynasty’s policy of governance through rites, Confucian rituals became deeply embedded as cultural traditions.⁷ In early Joseon, difficulties emerged in fully establishing Confucian rites due to cultural lag and conflicts with entrenched Buddhist rituals. However, the Joseon court strengthened policies such as the Certificate of Monkhood system (Docheopje 度牒制), restricting individuals from becoming monks, while progressively replacing royal Buddhist rituals with Confucian ones. In addition, Joseon systematically institutionalized Confucian rituals by compiling legal texts such as the National Code of the Five Rites (Gukjo Oryeui 國朝五禮儀), the Great Code of State Administration (Gyeongguk Daejeon 經國大典), and the Supplementary Edition of Funeral Rites (Sangnye Bopyeon 喪禮補編). Moreover, Joseon explicitly prohibited three-day funerals and cremation,⁸ legally mandating that all officials observe the three-year mourning ritual for parents.⁹

Since ancestral tablets (sinju 神主) served as the central objects of mourning and ancestral rites in Confucian tradition, the state actively encouraged the construction of ancestral shrines (sadang 祠堂). During the reign of King Sejong 世宗 (r. 1418-1450), regulations became strict enough to punish those who did not build shrines within set deadlines. Establishing ancestral shrines was crucial to institutionalizing the lineage system (jongbeop 宗法) and ancestral worship, as ancestral tablets symbolized the ancestors themselves. Thus, through legal codifications, mandated three-year mourning rituals, and encouragement of ancestral shrine construction, Joseon succeeded in institutionalizing Confucian rituals systematically (S. Kim 2012b, 72-79).

However, due to Joseon’s hierarchical society, the universality of the three-year mourning ritual remained controversial. Universalist positions viewed the three-year mourning ritual as a universally applicable rite, extending from emperors to commoners without discrimination.¹⁰

Conversely, exclusivist positions argued that rites did not extend to commoners (seoin 庶人), asserting they were limited to the scholargentry class (sajok 士族) and above.¹¹ In Joseon, debates continued until King Jungjong’s 中宗 (r. 1506–1544) reign regarding whether the three-year mourning should extend to non-scholar classes or remain restricted, as some commoners abused mourning periods to evade compulsory labor.¹² Ultimately, the Gyeongguk Daejeon stipulated a mourning period of 100 days for commoners.¹³

Thus, the hierarchical differentiation of rites persisted (J. Kim 2023, 64). However, the Gukjo Oryeui did prescribe funeral rites applicable to scholar-officials, commoners, and everyone in between (daebu, sa, seoin, sangui 大夫 士 庶人 喪儀). By the seventeenth century, with advances in ritual scholarship, three-year mourning rituals and four-generation ancestral rites became increasingly common across classes. King Yeongjo 英祖 (r. 1724–1776) himself declared: “Even commoners in rural areas perform ancestral rites for four generations. How much more so should the eldest sons responsible for continuing the main family lineage?,”¹⁴ thus reinforcing traditional mourning practices.¹⁵

The Confucian three-year mourning ritual, which flourished until the late Joseon dynasty, began to decline under Japanese colonial rule, largely due to the influence of colonial policies and Christianity. Western or Christian funeral practices—lacking the process of transforming the deceased into ancestral spirits—alongside Christian doctrines, functioned as significant mechanisms in weakening Korea’s Confucian mourning tradition.

In 1907, the Christian Funeral Manual published by Samuel Austin Moffett (1864–1939) outlined eight prohibitions against traditional Korean funeral practices. These included prohibitions against summoning the spirit (chohon 招魂), preparing the traditional spirit banner (myeongjeong 銘旌), expressing grief through ritual weeping (gok 哭), dressing the deceased in traditional burial clothing, binding the corpse during the cleansing ritual, and conducting ancestral rites at graves (Moffett 1907).¹⁶

Although Moffett claimed he aimed to abolish practices entrenched in Confucian or shamanistic customs (Ahn 2018), his actions represented a fundamental denial of Korea’s cultural tradition of mourning rites.

Furthermore, during the colonial period, Japanese authorities actively enforced the three-day funeral ritual through the “Ritual Ordinance” and the “Improved Funeral Standards,” stigmatizing the three-year mourning as outdated and undesirable. (Maeil Sinbo 1941, 1; Maeil Sinbo 1942, 3; National Mobilization Federation of Joseon 1941, 66–69). Funeral companies influenced by Japanese funeral practices continued to affect Korean funeral culture after liberation, ultimately establishing the three-day funeral as the standard form of funeral ritual in modern Korea. Additionally, during the Korean War (1950–1953), many households lost ancestral tablets, which further eroded traditional mourning practices. Subsequent industrialization, urbanization, apartment living, and weekly workplace culture made it increasingly difficult to maintain ancestral shrines, making the three-year mourning ritual virtually impossible for most families.

With the advent of professional funeral halls, family rituals were entrusted to funeral industry specialists, making the three-year mourning appear as a fossilized tradition. Nevertheless, prominent head families (jongga 宗家) and families maintaining a Confucian way of life continue the tradition of three-year mourning by maintaining ancestral tablets. For these families, the ancestral shrine remains essential, rendering the three-year mourning ritual a necessary component.

Though relatively infrequent, contemporary three-year mourning rituals have persisted without complete interruption, as confirmed by the authors direct participant observation and research. In addition to the cases mentioned in the introduction, other examples include the three-year mourning rituals for Kwon Yong-hyeon 權龍鉉 (1900-1988) in 1989, Yi Yong-gu 李龍九 (1908-1998) in 1998, and Yi Byeong-ju 李秉周 (1922-2000) in 2003. Additional three-year mourning rituals have also been observed among prominent head families in Andong.

Currently ongoing three-year mourning rituals include those for Yi Geun-pil 李根必 (1931-2024), the head descendant of Yi Hwang, which began on March 8, 2024, and for Yi Jeom-suk 李点淑 (1940-2024), the wife of the head descendant of Kim Seong-il, initiated on March 20, 2024. Considering that around 350,000 deaths occur annually in Korea, making the three-day funeral the prevalent norm, these occasional three-year mourning rituals may appear exceptional. Nevertheless, the continued observance of the three-year mourning ritual even in today’s society, dominated by the three-day funeral practice, underscores the enduring cultural significance and validity of Confucian funeral traditions within contemporary Korean culture.

IV. The Validity of the Traditional Confucian Three-Year Mourning Ritual

V. Contemporary Adaptation of the Traditional Confucian Three-Year Mourning Ritual System

VI. Conclusion

The Confucian three-year mourning ritual represents a significant cultural tradition within Korean funeral practices. Nonetheless, contemporary Korean funeral culture predominantly revolves around the three-day funeral (samiljang), which is fundamentally distinct from the traditional Confucian form. Unlike the three-year mourning, the three-day funeral has become reduced primarily to a formal procedure centered solely on the disposal of the deceased’s body. Despite this situation, the Confucian three-year mourning ritual continues to be practiced, particularly among historically prominent families (jongga). Unlike the three-day funeral, the Confucian three-year mourning fulills multiple functions, including handling the deceased’s remains, transforming the deceased into an ancestral spirit, and providing a mechanism for mourners to overcome trauma.

These traditional functions of the three-year mourning ritual remain valid even within modern society, though adaptations reflecting contemporary social contexts are also observable. The validity of the Confucian three-year mourning today is demonstrated firstly through its adherence to the traditional Confucian structure of rituals, which comprises procedures specifically designed for the deceased, the deceased’s soul, the ancestral spirit, and the mourners themselves.

Secondly, the ritual acts as a buffer mechanism to assist the chief mourner and their community in overcoming the existential crisis brought on by the death of a family head. From the moment the death occurs, the mourners enter a state of mourning. Through rituals such as the initial chouje 初虞祭—marked symbolically by the chief mourner's ceremonial bath—mourners gradually prepare to return to normal life. Subsequent rites (jolgok 卒哭, sosang 小祥, daesang 大祥, and damje 禫祭) progressively reduce the intensity of mourning, symbolized explicitly by gradual changes in mourning attire (subok 受服). Ultimately, with the concluding gilje 吉祭 ritual, the three-year process serves to systematically alleviate the mourners’ trauma, facilitating their full return to everyday life.

Thirdly, families practicing the three-year mourning ritual use the symbolic domestic mourning hut (ganae yeoso 家內廬所), a form combining graveside mourning with the ritual of returning home (bangok 反哭) while carrying the ancestral tablet. This visible symbol externally communicates the household’s observance of mourning, providing justification for temporary withdrawal from social obligations and enabling the continuity of familial succession rituals.

Fourthly, for families maintaining ancestral tablets, the three-year mourning ritual is necessary for reorganizing ancestral hierarchy within the family shrine. The mourning period marks the process by which the deceased’s soul is fully transformed into an ancestral spirit, indicated by the change in terminology from jeon 奠 to je 祭. The buje 祔祭 ritual officially announces to ancestors the enshrinement of a new spirit tablet. At the gilje, the spirit tablet of the fifth-generation ancestor is ritually relocated or buried, ceasing regular ancestral rites and introducing the newly enshrined tablet into the ancestral shrine hierarchy. This hierarchical adjustment necessitates the complete three-year ritual sequence.

Meanwhile, contemporary adaptations of the Confucian three-year mourning are clearly evident. First, the ritual has adapted to the professional requirements of modern social life. Unlike traditional society, contemporary mourners cannot realistically quit jobs or take extended leaves, requiring mourners to balance mourning duties with professional obligations and social activities. Thus, contemporary three-year mourning rituals inevitably incorporate the practical constraints of modern social and professional contexts.

Second, the rituals have adjusted to the modern workweek and calendar. Traditional Confucian mourning practices involved careful selection of auspicious dates. However, due to fixed modern work schedules, contemporary mourners instead schedule rituals on weekends or public holidays. This demonstrates a practical adaptation replacing traditional date-selection customs with contemporary considerations of social convenience and necessity.

Third, contemporary three-year mourning rituals have integrated aspects of the modern funeral industry. The standardized three-day funeral procedure heavily relies on professional funeral services. Contemporary three-year mourning has similarly adopted certain practices, such as compressing the traditionally separate procedures of washing and wrapping the body (seup 襲 and yeom 斂) into a single session on the second day. Additionally, even while conducting traditional rituals such as returning the deceased home (cheongeo jeongchim 遷居正寢) and summoning the spirit into an ancestral tablet, mourners have accepted the modern convention of displaying a portrait photograph, reflecting contemporary funeral practices.

Thus, the contemporary Confucian three-year mourning ritual continues to exhibit validity by faithfully inheriting traditional Confucian functions, meanings, and symbols. Simultaneously, it inevitably incorporates modern adaptations responding to current social contexts—embracing contemporary work life, practical calendar scheduling, and certain conventions from the modern funeral industry. Therefore, the modern Confucian three-year mourning ritual represents a dynamic blend of continued traditional validity and necessary modern adaptation, harmonizing historical practice with contemporary social realities.

References

• An, Ho-yong 안호용. 2014. “Joseon sidae-ui samnyeonsang-gwa gibokjedo” 조선시대의 삼년상과 기복제도 (The Three-year Mourning and Ki’bok in the Joseon Dynasty). Hanguk Sahoe 한국사회 (Journal of Social Research) 15 (2): 103–57.
• Ahn, Su-kang 안수강. 2018. “Yesugyohoe Sangnye (1907)-e natanan gyohun bunseok” 『예수교회상례』 (1907)에 나타난 교훈 분석 (An Analysis of Lessons through the Christian Burial Ceremony [1907]). Hanguk Gidokgyo Sinhak Nonchong 한국 기독교 신학 논총 (Korean Journal of Christian Studies) 110: 135–60.
• Chang, Chul-su 장철수. 1984. Hanguk jeontong sahoe-ui gwanhonsangje 한국전통사회의 관혼상제 (Rites of Passage in Traditional Korean Society). Seongnam: Academy of Korean Studies.
• Chang, Chul-su 장철수. 1990. Sadang-ui yeoksa-wa wichi-e gwanhan yeongu 사당의 역사와 위치에 관한 연구 (A Study on the History and Location of Ancestral Shrines). Seoul: National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage.
• Cho, Eun-suk 조은숙. 2016. “Yi Mun-geon simyosari-reul tonghae bon Joseon junggi yuja-ui sangnye gochal” 이문건 시묘살이를 통해 본 조선 중기 유자의 상례 고찰 (A Confucians Funeral Rituals During the Mid-Joseon Dynasty—Lee Mun Geon’s Mourning Beside His Mother’s Grave). Gojeon Munhak gwa Gyoyuk 고전 문학과 교육 (The Classical Literature and Education) 33: 153–84.
• Choe, Hang 崔恒. 1485. Gyeongguk Daejeon 經國大典 (Great Code of State Administration).
• Chun, Sun Young 천선영. 2000. “Jugeum-gwa jonggyo—oneul jonggyo-ga jugeum-ui munje-e daehayeo ‘dasi’ jumokhaeya haneun sahoehakjeok iyu-e daehayeo” 죽음과 종교—오늘 종교가 죽음의 문제에 대하여 “다시” 주목해야 하는 사회학적 이유에 대하여 (Death and Religion: Why Should We Ask This Question Today?). Gatollik Sahoe Gwahak Yeongu 가톨릭사회과학연구 (Journal of the Korean Catholic Academy of Social Sciences) 12: 135–53.
• Chun, Sun Young 천선영. 2014. “Byeongwon jangnyesikjang—geu giihagodo pyeonanhan donggeo: ‘sangjing giho chunggol’ gaenyeom-eul jungsimeuro han sironjeok tamsaek” 병원 장례식장—그 기이하고도 편안한 동거: “상징 기호 충돌” 개념을 중심으로 한 시론적 탐색 (The Incongruity of Funeral Halls in Hospitals). Sahoe Sasanggwa Munhwa 사회 사상과 문화 (Journal of Social Thoughts and Culture) 30: 291–325.
• Chunchugwan 春秋館 (Royal Archives and History Bureau). 1413-1865. Joseon Wangjo Sillok 朝鮮王朝實錄 (The Annals of the Joseon Dynasty). National Institute of Korean History. https://sillok.history.go.kr/
• Confucius. n.d. 禮記 Liji (Book of Rites).
• Faure, Bernard. 1997. Dongyang Jonggyo-wa Jugeum 동양 종교와 죽음 (La mort clans les religions d'Asie). Translated by Kim Joo-kyung. Seoul: Yeonglim Cardinal.
• Gungmin Chongnyeok Joseon Yeonmaeng (GCJY) 국민 청년 조선 연맹 (National Mobilization Federation of Joseon). 1941. “Gaeseon jangnye gijun jejeong-ui chwiji” 개선 장례 기준 제정의 취지 (The Purpose of Establishing the Improved Funeral Standards). Jogwang 조광, September Issue. Seoul: Chosun Ilbo Publishing Department.
• Ham, Yo-sang 함요상, and Seunghyun Hyun 현승현. 2013. “Jibang jeongbu-ui biseonhosiseol ipji seonjeong-e daehan galddeungjojeong gwajeong bunseok: Seoul chumogongwon-gwa Ulsan haneul gongwon sarye-reul jungsimeuro” 지방정부의 비선호시설 입지 선정에 대한 갈등조정 과정분석: 서울 추모공원과 울산 하늘공원 사례를 중심으로 (Analysis of Conflicts & Cooperation by siting locally Unwanted Facilities in Local Government: Focused on Seoul Memorial-Park and Ulsan Sky-Park). Jeongbuhak Yeongu 정부학 연구 (Journal of Governmental Studies) 19 (3): 451–92.
• Han, Gil-Soo 한길수. 2024. Hanguk-ui jangnye munhwa-wa sangjoeop 한국의 장례문화와 상조업 (Funeral Rites in Contemporary Korea: The Business of Death). Translated by Lee Mun-hee. Seoul: Haenam.
• Heo, Chang Soo 허창수. 2009. “Damron iron-ui sigak-eseo barabon jeongchaek gwajeong-gwa jeongchaek galddeung: Gyeonggi-do Hanam-si gwangyeok hwajangjang yuchi sarye-reul jungsimeuro” 담론이론의 시각에서 바라본 정책 과정과 정책 갈등: 경기도 하남시 광역 화장장 유치 사례를 중심으로 (Analyzing Policy Process and Policy Conflict from the Perspective of Discourse Theory: Case of Crematorium Construction in the City of Hanam). Hanguk Jeongchaek Hakhoe Bo 한국 정책 학회보 (Korean Political Science Review) 18(2): 129–56.
• Hu, Guang 胡廣. 1425. 『禮記大全』 Liji Daquan (Comprehensive Record of Rites).
• Kim, Jang-saeng 金長生. 1685. 『家禮輯覽』 Garye Jimnam (Compilation of Family Rites).
• Kim, Jin-Woo 김진우. 2023. “Joseon sidae bisajok sangnye-ui jeongchak yangsang-gwa geu seonggyeok” 조선시대 비사족 상례의 정착 양상과 그 성격 (The Settlement and Characteristic of Common People’s Mourning Ritual in the Joseon Dynasty). Dongguk Sahak 동국 사학 (The Dongguk Historical Society) 76: 41–72.
• Kim, Kyeong Sook 김경숙. 2001. “16segi sadaebuga-ui sangjerye-wa yeomosaenghwal—Yi Mun-geon-ui Mukjae Ilgi-reul jungsimeuro” 16세기 사대부가의 상제례와 여모생활—이문건의 『묵제일기』를 중심으로 (Funeral and Mourning Practices of 16th-Century Yangban Families: Focusing on Yi Mun-geon’s Mukjae Diary). Guksagwan Nonchong 국사관 논총 (Journal of National Institute of Korean History) 97: 115–49.
• Kim, Kyeong Sook 김경숙. 2016. “17segi mal sadaebuga-ui sangjangnye-wa geosang saenghwal: Yun I-hu ui Jiam Ilgi-reul jungsimeuro” 17세기말 사대부가의 상장례와 거상 생활 : 윤이후의 『지암일기』를 중심으로 (Funeral Ritual and Three-year-Mourning Practice of the Late-17th-Century Sa-Dae’bu Family Seen from Yun I-hu’s Chi-am Diary). Hanguksa Yeongu 한국사 연구 (Journal of Korean History) 172: 189–221.
• Kim, Kyeong Sook 김경숙. 2017. “18segi mal Sunam An Jeong-bokga-ui sangjangnye-wa geosang saenghwal” 18세기말 순암 안정복가의 상장례와 거상 생활 (Funeral Ritual and Living in Three-Year-Mourning of Ahn Jeong-bok Family in the Late-18th-Century). Gomunseo Yeongu 고문서 연구 (Korean Historical Manuscripts Research) 50: 229–52.
• Kim, Mun-taek 김문택. 2000. “Sangnye-wa simyosari” 상례와 시묘살이 (Funeral Rites and Grave-Side Mourning). In Joseon Sidae Saenghwalsa 2 조선시대 생활사 2 (Everyday Life in the Joseon Dynasty, Vol. 2), edited by the Korean Old Documents Research Association, 47–63. Goyang: Yeoksa Bipyeongsa 역사비평사.
• Kim, Seona 김선아, and Moon Gi Jeong 정문기. 2012. “Jijachejang-ui gyoche-wa biseonhosiseol ipjijeongchaek gyeoljeong byeonhwa: Bucheon-si chumogongwon joseong saoep-eul jungsimeuro” 지자체장의 교체와 비선호시설 입지정책 결정 변화: 부천시 추모공원 조성사업을 중심으로 (Changes in Policy Decisions on the Location of Unpopular Facilities Due to Changes in Local Government Heads: Focusing on the Bucheon City Memorial Park Project). Hanguk Haengjeong Yeongu 한국행정연구 (Korean Journal of Public Administration) 21 (2): 137–64.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2004. “Gilje-ui jeongchijeok seonggyeok” 길제의 정치적 성격 (The Political Characteristics of the Last Procedure of the Funeral Service). Bigyo Minsokhak 비교민속학 (Asian Comparative Folk Studies) 26: 411–435.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2005. “Hyeondae dosigonggan-ui sangjangnye munhwa” 현대 도시 공간의 상장례문화 (Funeral Culture in Contemporary Urban Area). Hanguk Minsokhak 한국민속학 (Korean Folk Studies) 41: 51–94.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2007. “Hyeondae Hanguk sangnye munhwa-ui byeonhwa” 현대 한국 상례문화의 변화 (Changes of Contemporary Korean Funeral Rites). Hanguk Munhwa Illyuhak 한국문화인류학 (Korean Folklore) 40 (2): 321–49.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2010. “Hyeondae Hanguk sahoe jeontong sangnye-ui hyeonhwang-gwa gwaje” 현대 한국 사회 전통상례의 현황과 과제 (The State and Challenges of Traditional Mourning Ritual in Present Korean Society). Gukhak Yeongu 국학연구 (Korean Studies) 17: 435–462.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2011a. Samnyeonsang—Soun Kim Si-in 삼년상—소운 김시인 (Research Paper on the Three-Year Funeral—Soun Kim Si-in). Seoul: National Folk Museum of Korea.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2011b. Samnyeonsang—Hwajae Yi U-seop 삼년상—화재 이우섭 (Research Paper on the Three-Year Funeral—Hwajae Yi U-seop). Seoul: National Folk Museum of Korea.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2012a. “Overview of Korea’s Funeral Industry.” In Invisible Population: The Place of the Dead in East Asian Megacities, edited by Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 192–205. New York: Lexington Books.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2012b. Hanguk-ui Sangnye Munhwa 한국의 상례 문화 (Korean Funeral Culture). Seoul: Minsokwon.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. “Jangnye” 장례 (Funeral Rites). 2022. Encyclopedia of Korean Culture. Academy of Korean Studies. https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0048409, .
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2024a. “Geomeunsaek jugeum sangjing-i hyeondae Hanguk jangnye e michin yeonghyang” 검은색 죽음 상징이 현대 한국 장례에 미친 영향 (The Impact of Black as a Symbol of Death on Modern Korean Funerals). Silcheon Minsokhak Yeongu 실천 민속학 연구 (The Study of Practice Folkloristics) 44: 115–50.
• Kim, ShiDug 김시덕. 2024b. “Samiljang sidae-e jisokdoeneun yugyosik samnyeonsangui jeonseung yangsang” 삼일장 시대에 지속되는 유교식 삼년상의 전승 양상 (The Transmission Patterns of the Confucian Three-year Mourning Custom that Persist in the Era of the Three-day Funeral). Bigyo Minsokhak 비교민속학 (Asian Comparative Folk Studies) 80: 49–84.
• Kim, Woo-sung 김우성. 2012. “Dosigyehoek siseol ipjiseonjeong-e ttareun jiyeokgalddeung-e daehan yeongu—Jangsasiseol-eul jungsimeuro” 도시계획시설 입지선정에 따른 지역갈등에 대한 연구—장사시설을 중심으로 (A Study on the Regional Conflicts on Location Selection of Urban Planning Facilities—Focused on Funeral Facilities). Master’s thesis, Sejong University Graduate School of Urban Real Estate.
• Kim, Yeseung 김예승, and Seong-u Hong 홍성우. 2010. “Jeongchaek neteuwokeu-reul tonghan biseonhosiseol ipjigalddeung bunseok: Wonji-dong ‘Seoul Chumogongwon’ sarye-reul jungsimeuro” 정책네트워트를 통한 비선호시설 입지갈등 분석: 원지동 “서울 추모공원” 사례를 중심으로 (Analysis of Conflicts over the Location of Unpopular Facilities through Policy Networks: Focusing on the “Seoul Memorial Park” Case in Wonji-dong). Hanguk Jeongchaek Yeongu 한국정책연구 (Journal of Korean Policy Studies) 10 (2): 29–49.
• Kim, Yong Cheun 김용천. 2019. “Gijang ‘Subok’ -ui gyujeong-gwa yehakjeok nonjaeng—Uirye ‘Sangbok’ pyeon-ui haeseok-eul jungsimeuro” 기장 “수복”의 규정과 예학적 논쟁—의례 “상복”편의 해석을 중심으로 (The Stipulation of “Shoufu (受服)” after a Funeral and Ritual Studies Argument). Taedong Gojon Yeongu 태동고전연구 (Tae-Dong Review of Classics) 42: 297–341.
• Kim, Yuri 김유리. 2017. “Joseon sidae yeomyo-ui jisok-gwa geu geungeo” 조선시대 여묘의 지속과 그 근거 (Historical and Cultural Reasons Behind the Continuation of the Yeomyo Practice During the Joseon Period). Jonggyohak Yeongu 종교학 연구 (Journal of Religious Studies) 35: 21–45.
• Lee, Nam-sik 이남식. 1989. “Damje, Gilje” 담제·길제 (Damje and Gilje Ceremonies). Gyeongbuk Yeakji 경북예악지 (Rites and Music Studies of Gyeongbuk): 318–60.
• Lee, Seock Kyu 이석규. 2013. “Joseon jeongi samnyeonsangje-ui hwangnip-gwa min-ui seongjang” 조선 전기 삼년상제의 확립과 민의 성장 (The Establishment of the Practice of the Three-Years Mourning and the Rise of the Common People in the Early Choson Dynasty). Hanguksa Yeongu 한국사 연구 (Journal of Korean History) 161: 101–13.
• Lee, Seung-min 이승민. 2016. “Goryeo sidae guksang jeolcha-wa samnyeonsang” 고려시대 국상 절차와 삼년상 (Procedures of National Mourning Ritual and Third-year Memorial Service in Goryeo Dynasty). Sahak Yeongu 사학연구 (Review of Korean History) 122: 79–125.
• Maeil Shinbo 매일신보 (Daily News). 1941. “Gaeseon jangnye gijun” 개선 장례 기준 (Improved Funeral Standards). July 30.
• Maeil Shinbo 매일신보 (Daily News). 1942. “Gaeseon honjangnye-ui gijun” 개선 혼장례의 기준 (Improved Wedding and Funeral Standards). October 2.
• Moffett, Samuel A. 1907. Yesugyohoe Sangnye 예수교회 상례 (Funeral Rites of the Christian Church). Publisher unknown.
• Park, Joo 박주. 2014. “18segi huban Gyeongsang-do Geochang-gun hyoja 3hyeongje-ui yeomyo saenghwal—Kim Geun-chu-ui Yeomyo Ilgi-reul jungsimeuro” 18세기 후반 경상도 거창군 효자 3형제의 여묘 생활—김근추의 『여묘일기』 를 중심으로 (Yeomyo [廬墓] Life of Three Brothers at Geochang, Kyungsang Province in the Late 18th Century—Through Yeomyo Diary of Kim-Keunchu [金謹樞]). Hanguk Sasang-gwa Munhwa 한국사상과 문화 (Korean Thought and Culture) 73: 107–32.
• Ravaisson-Mollien, and Jean Gaspard Fèlix Lachè. (1838) 2001. 習慣論 Shūkanron (De l’habitude). Translated by Matao Noda. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
• Ryu, Jang-won 柳長源. 1830. Sangbyeon Tonggo 常變通攷 (Comprehensive Study of Changes in Funeral Rites).
• Seo, Jeong-Hwa 서정화. 2023. “3nyeon-ui sang (Samnyeonsang)-gwa sang-ui ye (Sangnye), Yugwanhajiman dongjuhal su eomneun gaenyeom—Seonjin yuhak-eseoui yehakjeok gwanneom-eul jungsim-euro” 3년의 상 (三年喪)과 상의 예(喪禮), 유관하지만 동주할 수 없는 개념 — 선진 유학에서의 예학적 관념을 중심으로 (The Three Years of Sāng [喪] and Its Rituals as Relevant but Non-coexistent Concepts—Focusing on the Ideas of Confucian Rites in the Pre-Qín Era). Hanguk Cheolhak Nonjip 한국철학논집 (Journal of Korean Philosophical History) 79: 355–90.
• Sima, Qian 司馬遷. 91 BCE. Shiji 史記 (Records of the Grand Historian).
• Song, Jun-gil 宋浚吉. 1928. Dongchundangjip Sokjip 同春堂集 續集 (Supplement to the Collected Works of Dongchundang).
• Turner, Victor. 1966. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Yi, Jae 李縡. 1844. Sarye Pyeollam 四禮便覽 (Convenient Manual of the Four Rites).
• Zheng, Xuan 鄭玄. 647. Liji Zhengyi 禮記正義 (Correct Meaning of the Book of Rites).